For Nonprofit Program Managers ·
What you'll accomplish
Every staffing meeting starts with the same scramble: a week of case notes, unread, and ten minutes to find the patterns before the team sits down. A Claude Project fixes the repeat setup cost. You write your de-identification rule and your summary format once, and every week after that you paste in the week's notes and get a consistent, privacy-safe summary back, without re-explaining the rules each time.
What you'll need
Before you touch Claude, settle this: your organization's case management system almost certainly has rules about where client data can and can't go, and a general-purpose AI chatbot is not automatically an approved destination. Check your data-handling policy or ask your supervisor. If the answer is "de-identified summaries only," this guide is built around that. If your policy prohibits pasting client data into any outside tool at all, even de-identified, stop here and use this guide's format as a template for the manual summary instead.
What you should see: A new, empty project with a Custom Instructions field and a Files panel.
This is the step that matters most. Click into the Project's Custom Instructions (sometimes labeled Project Knowledge or Instructions) and write something close to this:
You are helping a nonprofit program manager summarize case notes for a weekly internal staffing meeting. Every note I paste in has already had client names, addresses, and other direct identifiers removed by me before pasting. Do not attempt to guess or reconstruct anyone's identity from context clues. If a pasted note still contains what looks like a full name, phone number, or address, stop and tell me before summarizing, so I can remove it. Summarize by theme: common needs, any urgent or safety-related flags, and suggested follow-ups. Never invent a detail that isn't in the notes I provide.
Save the instructions.
Before your real staffing week, test the Project with a made-up note so you're not learning the rules under deadline pressure. Paste a fake note like: "Client (initials only: J.R.) missed second appointment this month, reported transportation issues, requested bus pass info." Confirm Claude follows your summary format and doesn't ask for more identifying detail than you gave it.
What you should see: A short, themed summary that respects the de-identification rule you set. Troubleshooting: If Claude's summary reads generic or misses an obvious flag (like "missed second appointment"), your instructions may need to be more specific about what counts as urgent. Add an example to the Custom Instructions and try again.
Before every real use, strip names, addresses, phone numbers, and anything else that could identify a specific person. Replace names with initials or a case number your team already uses internally. This step happens outside Claude, in your notes document, not inside the chat.
Example prompt to copy-paste:
Here are this week's de-identified case notes, one per client (initials only). Summarize into three sections: common needs across clients, any urgent or safety flags that need follow-up before tomorrow's meeting, and suggested next steps for each flagged case.
Read the summary against the original notes, quickly. Confirm nothing was invented and nothing urgent got buried. This is a habit, not a formality: a missed flag in a case note summary can mean a client falls through the cracks.
What you should see: A one-page summary ready to read from or hand out at the staffing meeting.
Weekly staffing summary:
Summarize these de-identified case notes into common needs, urgent flags, and follow-ups for tomorrow's staffing meeting.
Spotting a pattern across weeks:
Here are summaries from the last four weeks. Are any needs or concerns showing up repeatedly for the same case initials? Flag any pattern that might need a program-level response, not just an individual follow-up.
Preparing a case for supervisor review:
Summarize this single case's notes from the past month into a timeline, noting each contact, what was offered, and what's still open. Keep it factual, no interpretation of the client's character or choices.